The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.
By a 5-4 vote, the court's conservative majority ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency overstepped its authority ...
The 5-to-4 decision is the latest setback for the agency and could have sweeping implications for curtailing water pollution ...
An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
The Supreme Court's decision is the latest in which conservative justices have reined in pollution control efforts.
TAG24 on MSN1d
Supreme Court ruling limiting EPA's ability to regulate water pollution raises alarm bellsThe Supreme Court limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate water pollution in a ruling that has ...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that EPA cannot enforce requirements in wastewater permits that “do not spell out what a ...
The Supreme Court's recent ruling limits EPA's ability to regulate sewage discharge into U.S. waterways affecting water ...
The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Environmental Protection Agency in a ruling on Tuesday involving a wastewater ...
The ruling could increase the workload of EPA and state permitting offices to enforce the Clean Water Act, at a time when the ...
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the EPA overstepped by imposing vague sewage limits on San Francisco, curbing agency power ...
Tuesday that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) rules for the city of San Francisco under the Clean Water Act on raw ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback