Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut on Sunday called Justice Samuel Alito “stunningly wrong” in his contention that Congress should stay out of the Supreme Court’s business and stop ...

So I’ve been intrigued by the “upside down” American flag that flew on the suburban Washington, D.C. property of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and his wife, Martha, following the Jan. 6 ...

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is heard agreeing with a woman who says the United States should return “to a place of godliness. ... Sign up for NBC Connecticut's News Headlines newsletter.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Jr. Credit: JoshEllie1234, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons Support trusted journalism in Connecticut. Join CT Mirror’s members today and make an impact.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito poses for an official photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, ... a Connecticut Democrat, said he believes Alito broke the law and should be held accountable.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito said Tuesday night that the leak of the draft opinion to overturn Roe v. Wade earlier this year endangered the lives of justices by putting a target on their backs.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. seems to have a profoundly different notion of “avoiding even the appearance of impropriety” than that held by T. Emmet Clarie, for whom I clerked from 1981 to 1992 ...

The Supreme Court voted on June 24 to revoke federal protection for abortion rights via their ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health. Conservative partisans praise this decision and claim … ...

In 2008, Paul Singer flew Alito to Alaska on a private jet. In the years after, Singer’s hedge fund came before the court at least 10 times. Get Connecticut public policy news at your fingertips.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., on Wednesday introduced articles of impeachment against Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, saying that their refusal to recuse from ...

Justice Samuel Alito belongs to the latter category. ... Connecticut, the 1965 case confirming the constitutional right of married couples to buy and use contraception; Loving v.