Last week, the Trump administration delivered a serious blow to US climate policy by repealing the longstanding scientific finding that greenhouse gas pollution poses a danger to humans. Getting to ...
Under EPA’s proposed rule, the NPDES state certification process would focus on discharges and their direct impact on water quality.
Will the justices reconsider their finding that Congress authorized the agency to regulate greenhouse gases?
As was expected, the first legal challenge to the Trump administration's repeal of a key climate law, the "endangerment finding," was filed. The repeal provides a path for the Supreme Court to ...
Environmental advocates say the outlined revision ignores science and threatens water quality, while farm groups argue it offers landowners needed clarity about which parts of their land count as ...
The EPA’s repeal of the “endangerment finding” could threaten automakers and oil companies — if it survives in court.
Climate change plaintiffs now claim that greenhouse gases are causing property damage through fire, flood, and frost, ...
In short: the agency will no longer be able to regulate carbon pollution or greenhouse gases—though a couple of scenarios might prevent President Trump from getting his way.
EPA Director Lee Zeldin told Politico at a Munich Security Conference event this week how the reversal of the EPA's 2009 Carbon "endangerment finding" changes how the federal government interprets the ...
"We must reaffirm our commitment to science, rule of law and the fundamental responsibility to safeguard public health," writes Rockford's Mike Bacon.
As the EPA moves to roll back the endangerment finding, which allows it to regulate greenhouse gases, experts predict uncertainty for business and a protracted legal fight.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results