Supreme Court Rules the Clean Water Act Doesn’t Actually Require That Water Be Clean
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court substantially weakened federal limitations on raw sewage discharge into nearby bodies of water. Its 5–4 decision will, in practice, free cities to dump substantially more sewage into rivers,
Latin Times on MSN4d
Supreme Court Leaves Users Disgusted After Rolling Back Clean Water Act's Raw Sewage Discharge Limitations: 'Poop Is Back On the Menu'The Supreme Court weakened restrictions on the discharge of raw sewage into water supplies in a 5-4 decision to roll back ...
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the EPA overstepped by imposing vague sewage limits on San Francisco, curbing agency power ...
Justice Amy Coney Barrett said the Supreme Court reached a "puzzling" conclusion in a case on water regulations issued by the EPA.
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled on March 4 that it had sided with the city of San Francisco and against the U.S.
Americans are getting antsy about the possibility of poop in the drinking water thanks to a new interpretation of the Clean ...
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.
Justice Samuel Alito's dissent was a platform to vent about his views of judicial overreach — while engaging in some himself.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback