Conservatives on the Supreme Court have again rescued the nation from out-of-control bureaucrats inflicting prohibitive costs ...
An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
2dOpinion
The New Republic on MSNThe Supreme Court Muddied the Clean Water Act Yet AgainAmy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices in a dissent against Samuel Alito—and his thinly veiled policy agenda.
The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.
Tuesday that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) rules for the city of San Francisco under the Clean Water Act on raw ...
The Supreme Court's decision is the latest in which conservative justices have reined in pollution control efforts.
The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Environmental Protection Agency in a ruling on Tuesday involving a wastewater ...
But over the past 50 years, some places have occasionally run afoul of the act. In San Francisco, the wastewater system ...
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the EPA overstepped by imposing vague sewage limits on San Francisco, curbing agency power ...
The Supreme Court's conservative majority ruled for San Francisco in limiting the power of environmental regulators to ...
By a 5-4 vote, the court's conservative majority ruled that the EPA overstepped its authority under the Clean Water Act with ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results